Jack Malebranche was certainly not looking to make friends within the
worldwide and ever expanding “Gay Community” when he set about
writing Androphilia. Much like the massive upheaval of Lutheranism,
Androphilia threatens to collapse the “Gay Identity” in upon
itself revealing a new ideal by which to lead the homosexual
community forward. Jack has come to liberate homosexual men from the
trappings of sissydom by revealing the inherent but largely shunned
masculinity in many homosexual males.
Written like a man impassioned to rescue his people who have been led
astray to wander a barren and desolate domain divorced from their
very nature Jack rains down blow after blow on “Gay Culture”
breaking away the definitions and inhibitions of social and political
agendas revealing the raw and undiscovered force of the true
homosexual male identity. It comes as no surprise that such an
ambitious declaration would find a home with Scapegoat Publishing
whose motto reads “Blame Us.” No doubt with a title like roots.
Androphilia – A Manifesto “Rejecting The Gay Identity, Reclaiming
Masculinity most of the magazines and publishers within the “Queer
Press” would find Jack’s revolutionary ideas to be a threat to
their investment in “Gay Culture.”
So what is Jack really attempting with Androphilia and is he
successful? With so many books attempting to hand homosexual men
theories on identity, community, sexuality, etc. is Androphilia a
revealing or relevant voice in the din of self help books and feel
good declarations of homosexual elitism? Testifying as a man loving
homosexual I am compelled to declare this as one of the most relevant
books on the subject of homosexuality that I have ever read.
Jack leads the reader on a journey buffered with historical and
social references that trace the progression of attitudes and ideas
about homosexuality and the men who participate in it from the
glorified days of such masculine homosexual icons as Alexander the
Great to the modern day gay ideal of female and feminine
idealization. Through various approaches and angels Jack explores
the historical / social progression of homosexuality becoming related
to efiminate behavior and the eventual progression of homosexual
males being defined as something “other” than their heterosexual
male counterparts. This distinction has had devastating consequences
leading homosexual males to become identified with anything but
traditional masculinity in the rag tag rush to establish a new identity.
As naturally masculine homosexual male I found Jack’s book to be the
missing link in my own life journey. Androphilia casts out a rescue
rope to those of us floating in the ocean of “Gay Culture” adrift
and alienated from the deification of femininity and the celebration
of all things sissy and trivial. In order to break these stereotypes
and liberate the queer community from these chains of self-imposed
restriction Jack has had to deconstruct some of the highest held
tenants of “Queer Culture” such as the myth that homosexuality is
not a choice. Jack discusses how homosexual men in past centuries
chose to marry women and have productive families whilst ignoring
their homosexual impulses or else acting on them in secrecy. This
proposition that homosexuals have choice as to whether they act upon
such sexual impulses flies in the face of the “Queer” agenda yet
no one can deny that having sex with anyone is indeed a choice driven
by sexual impulse. The book is filled with many such taboo ideas
that threaten to deconstruct the current Gay Rights political
agenda. Though some may see this as threatening I found the idea
empowering that I choose to share my flesh with men rather than being
victim to some uncontrollable influence of nurture or nature that
leaves one with a sense of victimization. Another revealing
discussion is the idea that queer men lack respect in the eyes of
their heterosexual male counterparts because they have largely
abandoned the ideals and responsibilities of manhood and masculinity
thus not making them men in the eyes of other men who shoulder the
burden of masculinity. Ideas such as these reveal painful
revelations which if addressed could heal the rift and alienation
felt by homosexual from society and mainstream culture.
The core theory of the book is the proposition of a new identity
titled “Androphile” which describes a male love of the masculine.
This Androphile is in many ways the counter image of the modern
“Fag”. The Androphile enjoys the company of his fellow man,
enjoys traditionally male pursuits and forms of recreation and as an
extension of this enjoyment of the masculine his sexuality is also
indulged by enjoying the fraternal sexual company of his fellow man.
This new “Androphile” identity is exactly what has been missing in
the modern gay culture whose only emulation of the masculine is
embodied in such staged like productions as the Village People who
fall far from an authentic representation of masculinity. Jack is
careful not to dismiss the efiminate queer man but rather offers
those who fall outside this stereotype a shelter. Jack acknowledges
that though some queer men are inherently feminine somehow we have
all become defined as such leaving no place in queer or mainstream
culture for the masculine identified homosexual male.
In addition to proposing some very compelling ideas and arguments
Jack also offers suggestions for homosexual men looking to deprogram
their queer / sissy identity and begin exploring their inherent
masculine nature. The author discusses the roots of the “queer
inferiority” complex and offers encouraging ideas on how to find
your niche amongst other men regardless of their sexual orientation.
By laying claim to traditional masculine roles, ideals, and
responsibilities masculine inclined homosexual men might find that
missing something that gay culture threw in the gutter as they
stampeded into the mainstream spotlight.
I found Androphile to be a gripping read. The book flows easily
between chapters and the progression is nicely structured leading
from one conclusion to another. Concise is another word which
applies to the book. Wrapping up at a mere one hundred and forty-
three pages Androphilia is anything but excessive. The author trims
the fat and delivers his ideas without much waste of the readers
time. Though the book is rather short the ideas inside may take the
reader some time to digest. Some of the suggestions where so foreign
to me I had to set the book aside for a week at a time in order to
fully ponder the suggestions and allow my own thinking to readjust to
the new ideas. At times I found myself rejecting some of the ideas
the author suggesting only to later find myself agreeing after my
initial defenses relaxed. And that is nothing to say about the
discussions this books has spurred amidst me and my friends.
Lastly, this book is a worthwhile read not only for homosexual men
but for any man. It is the first discussion about masculinity of its
nature I have ever read and it left me wondering what we have yet to
discover about ourselves as men in light of the feminist movement
which has published countless books addressing the reality of womanhood.
I thank Jack for going out on such a tenuous limb to write and
publish this much needed manifesto and I encourage all the men and
women reading this to purchase a copy and allow your hard set ideas
about masculinity and self under go the trial of Androphilia! For
very dismissive or denouncing review this book might receive in the
mainstream queer press it is sure to be held in high regard by the
many refugees of “Queer Culture.”